The Newton Breast Cancer Study
The Newton Breast Cancer Study was initiated as follow-up to research by the Massachusetts
Department of Public Health (MDPH) that identified areas of high and low
incidence in Newton, ranging from 22% below to 55% above the statewide rate for
the period 1982-1992. The study, conducted by Silent Spring Institute, investigated
differences between the high- and low-incidence areas in factors known or hypothesized
to affect breast cancer risk. The study involved approximately 1,350 Newton women
who responded to a questionnaire about their health history, individual characteristics
and habits, and home environments.
Key Findings
Traditional individual characteristics known to affect
breast cancer risk, including reproductive
history and family history of breast cancer, account
for only 5% of the difference in breast cancer rates
between high- and low-incidence areas.
Possible environmental risk factors, which are associated
with higher income and education, contribute 14% to the
difference between high- and low-incidence areas. Possible
environmental factors include use of lawn services, dry
cleaning, and pesticide use.
At the outset of the study, census data showed that
residents of Newton's higher incidence area had higher
incomes than those in the low-incidence neighborhood.
Survey results similarly showed higher income, education,
and other indicators of higher socioeconomic status (SES)
in high-incidence areas. |


|
Because income and education are not themselves causes of
breast cancer, further analysis investigated whether the well-known
association between SES and breast cancer risk may be the result
of environmental exposures. Results showed that significantly
greater use of certain products among higher SES women contributed
to differences between high- and low-incidence areas.
| |
65% of women in high-incidence areas, reported
using professional lawn service compared with 36% in low-incidence
areas. |
| |
17% of women in high-incidence areas reported
using termite treatments in their homes, compared with
9% in the low-incidence areas. |
| |
30% of women in high-incidence areas reported
high routine use of pesticides, compared with 23% in low-incidence
areas. |
| |
36% of women in high incidence areas reported
use of flea and tick products, compared with 42% in low-incidence
areas, a pattern in contrast to results on use of other
chemical products. |
These findings are intriguing because many pesticides contain
endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) that mimic our natural hormones.
Exposure to EDCs is an emerging area of study for breast
cancer risk. Since a woman's lifetime exposure to natural
estrogen is linked to higher breast cancer risk, exposure
to compounds that mimic estrogen and other hormones may also
increase risk.
Higher rates of mammography and breast self-exam in high-incidence
areas are likely to contribute to higher reported breast cancer
rates: 27% of women in high-incidence areas said they had had
10 or more mammograms, compared with 17% in low-incidence areas.
Because screening leads to earlier diagnoses, it may contribute
to temporarily higher reported incidence.
The higher proportion of Jewish women in high-incidence areas
did not account for the difference in incidence between the
study areas.
The study team included researchers from JSI Research and Training Institute,
Inc. and Applied Geographics, Inc. |